Stable URL: http://ancientassociations.ku.dk/assoc/819Download as
PDFLast Updated on 02 Mar 2017
i. |
Geographical area |
Macedonia
|
ii. |
Region |
Edonis
|
iii. |
Site |
Amphipolis
|
i. |
Full name (original language) |
οἱ ὑπόστολοι (SEG 36: 583, l. 3)
|
ii. |
Full name (transliterated) |
hoi hypostoloi
|
ii. |
Name elements |
Cultic: | ὑπόστολοι, hypostoloi The members of the association, if indeed this was one, are identified as ὑπόστολοι, hypostoloi, officials (or initiates of a higher order) of the cult of the Egyptian Gods known from other parts of the Greek world (see RICIS 113/0908). |
|
i. |
Source(s) |
SEG 36: 583 (68/7 BC)
|
|
Note |
See also: RICIS 113/0908 (Note that the date is not 67/6 BC as in SEG and RICIS, but 68/7 BC).
|
|
Online Resources |
SEG 36: 583
|
i.a. |
Source type(s) |
Epigraphic source(s)
|
i.b. |
Document(s) typology & language/script |
Greek honorific inscription
|
i.c. |
Physical format(s) |
Stele with relief of a crown
|
ii. |
Leadership |
As is often the case in the cult of the Egyptian Gods, it is unclear whether the ἱερεύς, hiereus, was a priest of the whole sanctuary or simply of a particular cult (in this case presumably of Isis), and whether he should be seen as a member, and thus presumably leader, of the association, or not.
|
iii. |
Members |
The members are called ὑπόστολοι, hypostoloi; the meaning of the term and the exact status of the hypostoloi is unclear (see the sources, the bibliography and discussion in RICIS 113/0908).
|
iv. |
Officials |
It is unclear whether the τριήραρχος, trierarchos, honoured for conducting in proper manner the navigium Isidis (see RICIS 113/0908 for similar titles in the cult of Isis) should be seen as a member of the association (if indeed there was one) of the hypostoloi or not.
|
iii. |
Bibliography |
Veligianni, C. (1986), ‘Hypostoloi und Trierarchos auf einer neuen Inschrift aus Amphipolis’, ZPE 62: 241-6.
|
i. |
Private association |
Probable
|
|
Note |
As is often the case in the organization of the cult of the Egyptian Gods, the structure of the cult, its possible associative character, how the liturgical personnel and / or the higher order of initiates operated, and the connection between the association (if there was one) and the civic structures are matters which remain unclear.
|