Stable URL: http://ancientassociations.ku.dk/assoc/335Download as PDF
Last Updated on 22 Feb 2017

Author: Ilias Arnaoutoglou

CAPInv. 335: [he synodos he meta Asklepi?]odoton

I. LOCATION

i. Geographical area Attica with Salamis
ii. Region Attica
iii. Site Athens

II. NAME

i. Full name (original language) [ἡ σύνοδος ἡ μετὰ Ἀσκληπι?]όδοτον (IG II2 1208, ll. 1-2)
ii. Full name (transliterated) [he synodos he meta Asklepi?]odoton

III. DATE

i. Date(s) s. iv BC

IV. NAME AND TERMINOLOGY

ii. Name elements
Personal:meta Asklepi?]odoton
iii. Descriptive terms σύνοδος, synodos (?)
Note synodos: IG II2 1208, l. 1
The term is wholly restored.

V. SOURCES

i. Source(s) IG II2 1208
Online Resources IG II2 1208
i.a. Source type(s) Epigraphic source(s)
i.b. Document(s) typology & language/script Fragmentary Greek honorary decree for an unknown, son of Daisias of Paiania.
i.c. Physical format(s) Fragmentary stele preserving only its left side.
ii. Source(s) provenance Athens, now in the Epigraphical Museum EM 5316.

VII. ORGANIZATION

iv. Officials The restored term [ἄρ]χουσιν, [ar]chousin, l. 7 may indicate the officials of the group.
Herald, κῆρυξ, keryx, l. 1.

IX. MEMBERSHIP

ii. Gender Men
Note The gender of the terminology referring to officials is masculine.
iii. Age Adults
iv. Status Citizen

X. ACTIVITIES

iv. Honours/Other activities The phrase ἐστε[φάνωσαν|εν---], este[phanosanen---] in l. 2 testifies to some sort of crowning.

XII. NOTES

iii. Bibliography Lasagni, C. (2004), ‘I decreti onorifici dei demi attici e la prassi politica della realita locali’, in E. Culasso Gastaldi (ed.), La prassi della democrazia ad Atene: voci di un seminario. Alessandria: 91-128.
Whitehead, D. (1986), The demes of Attica 508/7-ca. 250 B.C. A political and social study. Princeton.
Wilhelm, A. (2006), ‘Attische Urkunden. Teil VI'’, in H. Taeuber (ed.), A. Wilhelm. Kleine Schriften III. Schriften aus Adolf Wilhelm Nachlass, Wien: 270, no. 42.

XIII. EVALUATION

i. Private association Discarded
Note The restoration synodos, proposed by A. Wilhelm, is not very convincing, since fourth century BC is too early for a group to be called synodos. As it was envisaged in IG it may be a decree of a deme (where the expression aneipein ton keruka occurs), also Lasagni (2004); however, Whitehead 1986: 392, no. 140 is rightfully sceptical about the restorations and the ascription to a deme.