Stable URL: http://ancientassociations.ku.dk/assoc/986Download as
PDFLast Updated on 10 Jul 2019
i. |
Geographical area |
Central Greece
|
ii. |
Region |
Boiotia
|
iii. |
Site |
Thespiai
|
i. |
Full name (original language) |
οἱ ἐνκωμιασταί (I.Thespiai 382, l. 2; I.Thespiai 383, l. 2)
|
ii. |
Full name (transliterated) |
hoi enkomiastai
|
ii. |
Name elements |
Professional: | Composers of hymns (enkomia) |
|
i. |
Source(s) |
I.Thespiai 382 (l. i AD) I.Thespiai 383 (l. i AD) See XII.i Comments.
|
|
Note |
See also: Roesch 1982: 177-82, nos. 27 and 28 (SEG 32: 502)
|
|
Online Resources |
I.Thespiai 382 I.Thespiai 383
|
i.a. |
Source type(s) |
Epigraphic source(s)
|
i.b. |
Document(s) typology & language/script |
Two dedications by the enkomiastai of statues of the brothers T. Fl. Mondon and T. Fl. Phileinos, both sons of Phileinos. Both insciptions are written in Greek.
|
i.c. |
Physical format(s) |
Two statue bases. I.Thespiai 383 seems to have disappeared. I.Thespiai 382 is of beige limestone.
|
iv. |
Honours/Other activities |
The enkomiastai erected monuments for two young brothers (epheboi, I.Thespiai 382, l. 3; I.Thespiai 383, ll. 3-4), son of a member of a local elite family.
|
i. |
Local interaction |
The two young men belong to the local elite. Their family can be traced over a period of three centuries (see Jones 1970).
|
i. |
Comments |
There has been some uncertainty in regards to the dating of the inscriptions. Both were attributed to late i AD in I.Thespiai 382 and 383. However, I Thespiai 383 was by Roesch dated to the second half of ii AD a dating that is also used by LGPN IIIb Philinos. If the two inscriptions are coterminous then it is difficult to ascertain whether or not it was a lasting association. I.Thespiai 383 might lend credence to a permanent association if the inscription should be dated to ii AD (Roesch 1982 p. 178).
|
iii. |
Bibliography |
Jones, C.P. (1970), ‘A Leading Family of Roman Thespiae’, HSPh 74: 223–55. Roesch, P. (1982), Etudes béotiennes. Paris.
|
i. |
Private association |
Possible
|
|
Note |
It is not possible to conclude whether this was a permanent association or not. If it was, then the generic terminology employed would suggest a private one.
|